Blood Sampling Cards: An Expert Overview

Blood microsampling is a method used to collect and analyse very small volumes of blood for analysis. This involves the use of a specially-designed lancet to prick the skin on a heel, fingertip, or other collection site on the body. This draws small amounts of blood in the 10-50 μL range from the capillaries (tiny blood vessels near the surface of the skin) in a quick and minimally-invasive manner. Today, blood microsamples are primarily collected on dedicated blood sampling cards, which are then processed for a range of clinical and non-clinical tests.

Blood microsampling offers many advantages over conventional venous blood sampling, such as:

  • The minimally-invasive sampling approach increases patient comfort and makes it easier to perform testing in children
  • Microsampling is faster and cheaper than venepuncture, since it negates the need for trained phlebotomists
  • Microsampling increases access to testing in remote areas and for individuals who find it difficult to attend medical facilities for venous blood testing

So, what exactly is a blood sampling card?

In its simplest form, a blood microsampling card is a piece of filter paper typically comprised of 100 % cotton linter fibre material. Often referred to as Guthrie cards, the blood sampling cards used today originate from the work of American microbiologist Robert Guthrie, who, in the 1960s, set out to develop new testing methods for several metabolic disorders. He envisioned dried blood spots collected on special filter papers as a sample format that would be easy to collect, transport, and test.

Since their origin in the 1960s, blood sampling cards have become a crucial part of national newborn screening (NBS) programmes, and in recent years, their utility in other applications has gained attention, such as monitoring individuals with inherited metabolic disorders, public health surveillance, and biomarker detection.

In current practice, capillary blood is collected from an individual via heel- or finger-prick, and an unknown volume of this blood is spotted onto a card. Once the blood has dried into the card, a sub-punch (or disc), ranging from 3-6 mm in diameter, is removed from the card, which serves as the sample for downstream analysis. The analytes of interest (e.g., metabolites, drugs, antibodies) are then extracted from the disc and measured using an appropriate analytical method, e.g., mass spectrometry, immunoassay, or nucleic acid sequencing. A comprehensive overview of the analytes measured from conventional Guthrie cards can be found elsewhere (1).

DBS sampling typically involves puncturing of the fingertip with a lancet, and then applying a large blood drop into each of the circled areas of a DBS card.

What blood sampling cards are available on the market today?

A number of specialised blood sampling cards exist, but only two types are pre-qualified by the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) for use in NBS. These are cards comprising the Whatman 903 Specimen Collection Paper or the PerkinElmer 226 Specimen Collection Paper, which primarily serve the US and European markets, respectively.

To be approved for use in NBS, blood sampling cards must as a minimum conform to three major criteria as laid out by the US Clinical & Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI):

  1. The applied blood must be absorbed into the card within a certain time period
  2. The blood must spread homogenously across the card, and…
  3. It must be demonstrable via isotopic labelling that the blood has spread homogenously through the card

Since Guthrie’s work in the 1960s, NBS has become routine in most parts of the world. Today, NBS programmes screen for congenital hearing loss, critical cardiac heart defects, and numerous metabolic, blood, endocrine, immunological, and other genetic disorders. These screening programmes are qualitative, and a yes/no answer in the heel-prick test shortly after birth will prompt follow up testing to confirm or rule out the suspected condition. Importantly, early detection facilitates timely treatment for better overall prognoses.

Ahlstrom Grade 222 and 320 filter papers are used in Capitainer®B10 and Capitainer®B50, respectively, for the accurate collection of 10 μL or 50 μL of capillary blood. These filter papers are thicker than those used in NBS, and they offer extremely high absorbency which enables a larger sample volume in a smaller disc diameter of 6 mm. As a side note, this diameter also allows the discs to fit neatly into the wells of 96-well plates for seamless pre-analytical processing, without any manual intervention. Finally, their uniform and smooth structure makes these cards ideal for applications that require accurate and reproducible sampling.

Traditional DBS microsampling is semi-quantitative at best

As mentioned above, NBS programmes are qualitative, and this is for several reasons. Firstly, it is standard practice to assume that a 3.2 mm diameter sub-punch equates to 3.1 μL of whole blood (2), but in reality, blood volumes can vary greatly across sub-punches of the same size. These variable and unknown blood volumes lead to analytical bias because a higher sampling volume usually leads to higher analyte recovery even across sub-punches of equal size. For example, previous studies have shown that, if a liquid blood sample containing phenylalanine at a concentration of 360 μmol/L is applied to filter paper in different volumes (10-100 μL), the mean concentration of the actual measured phenylalanine in the DBS samples (using a standard 3.2-mm sub-punch for analysis) would vary from 300 μmol/L in the 10 μL DBS to 400 μmol/L in the 100 μL DBS (3).

Other factors that render NBS blood sampling cards qualitative include the hematocrit effect, whereby the proportion of red blood cells in the blood influences blood viscosity and impedes homogenous spreading of blood throughout the card, as well as documented variation in analyte distribution, which was recently discussed in relation to PKU monitoring by Hogg et al., 2023 (2).

Therefore, while sufficient and ideal for the purpose of NBS and qualitative tests with yes/no answers, the blood sampling cards described so far are not suitable for applications that require quantification, e.g., TDM, viral load monitoring, and accurate monitoring of individuals with inborn errors of metabolism.

Volumetric microsampling allows quantitative analysis

The development of volumetric blood microsampling devices that consistently meter an exact known volume has made it possible to perform quantitative analyses based on dried blood microsamples. Capitainer’s devices are built upon proprietary microfluidic technology that makes it possible to meter a known blood volume to a pre-cut DBS disc, which serves as the sub-punch or sample for analyte extraction and analysis. In this way, we eliminate the biases associated with conventional blood sampling cards.

So far, our volumetric devices have already been explored with success in diverse applications including therapeutic drug monitoring, quantitative detection of biomarkers for cardiovascular disease, and large-scale serological surveillance, with several other investigations ongoing.

Photo: Neil Spooner, published with permission.
The hematocrit (Hct) effect impacts the spread of blood across the filter paper.

Blood sampling cards continue to evolve

In summary, blood sampling cards have made a fundamental contribution to the establishment of NBS programmes all over the world, and as microsampling evolves, we see new applications emerging within medicine and public health surveillance programmes. Importantly, the potential of microsampling to replace venepuncture in these applications allows a patient-centric approach to healthcare and improved access to diagnostic testing and monitoring in remote areas.

Indeed, the recent development of specialised blood sampling cards that are optimised for nucleic acid isolation and analysis highlights the continuous evolution of DBS technology from what was once a crude method to detect PKU with Guthrie’s cards to a modern and versatile tool with unlimited possibilities.



  1. Freeman JD, Rosman LM, Ratcliff JD, et alState of the Science in Dried Blood Spots. Clin Chem. 2018 Apr;64(4):656-679.
  2. Hogg SL, Carling RS, Cantley NW, et alCross-sectional audit assessing the quality of dried bloodspot specimens received by UK metabolic biochemistry laboratories for the biochemical monitoring of individuals with Phenylketonuria. Ann Clin Biochem. 2023 May;60(3):208-211.
  3. Moat SJ, Schulenburg-Brand D, Lemonde H, Bonham JR, Weykamp CW, Mei JV, Shortland GS, Carling RS. Performance of laboratory tests used to measure blood phenylalanine for the monitoring of patients with phenylketonuria. J Inherit Metab Dis. 2020 Mar;43(2):179-188.


outstanding technical support


we offer a full product guarantee


we offer free delivery to UK universities and non profit organisations