Nano Secondary Antibodies

Introduction

Camelid species such as Alpaca and Llama produce a unique class of antibodies composed only of heavy chains. The antigen-binding fragments (Fab), also termed Variable Heavy-Chain only fragment antibodies (VHH Fragments), or nanobodies (Figure 1), are an exciting, novel antibody format. With their small 15 kDa size and outstanding specificity and penetration, VHH Fragments offer a fantastic solution for high-quality and high-resolution imaging. Jackson ImmunoResearch Nano Secondaries are a specialized detection reagent that harnesses the unique properties of VHH Fragments to produce high-quality results.

Figure 1. Comparison of conventional IgG with VHH alongside canonical Immunoglobulins, Camelids such as Alpacas make heavy chain only IgGs. The antigen-binding domain (Fab fragment) of IgG2 and 3 do not contain the CH1 domain of the heavy chain and the light chains are also absent. These heavy-chain only Fab fragments are called VHHs or nanobodies.

About Nano Secondary antibodies

Jackson Immunoresearch Nano Secondaries are polyclonal VHH Fragment antibodies (nanobodies) produced in Alpacas. They are available with specificity to Human, Rabbit or Mouse. Being 10x smaller than conventional whole IgG antibodies, the <15kDa VHH Fragment antibodies are perfect for imaging experiments where good penetration is necessary. Nano Secondary antibodies are cross-adsorbed for exquisite specificity against target species with minimal cross-reactivity to other commonly used species, making them suitable for application in multiple labeling experiments. They are available conjugated to reporter enzymes and a range of fluorescent dyes including Alexa Fluor® providing scope for high-resolution Immunohistochemistry and Immunofluorescence.

Nano Secondaries

 

Unconjugated Biotin-SP
(long spacer)
DyLight™
405
A=400, E=421
Alexa Fluor®
488
A=493, E=519
Cyanine
Cy™3
A=550, E=570
Rhodamine
Red™-X (RRX)
A=570, E=590
Alexa Fluor®
594
A=591, E=614
Alexa Fluor®
647
A=651, E=667
Alexa Fluor®
680
A=684, E=702
Alexa Fluor®
790
A=792, E=803
Antibody Description: VHH Fragment ANTI-HUMAN Alpaca Anti-Human IgG (H+L) (min X Bov, Ms, Rb Sr Prot)
0.0 mg
609-004-213
0.1 ml
609-064-213
0.1 mg
609-474-213
0.1 mg
609-544-213
0.1 mg
609-164-213
0.1 mg
609-294-213
0.1 mg
609-584-213
0.1 mg
609-604-213
0.1 mg
609-624-213
0.1 mg
609-654-213
Antibody Description: VHH Fragment ANTI-MOUSE Alpaca Anti-Mouse IgG (H+L) (min X Bov, Hu, Rb Sr Prot)
0.0 mg
615-004-214
0.1 ml
615-064-214
0.1 mg
615-474-214
0.1 mg
615-544-214
0.1 mg
615-164-214
0.1 mg
615-294-214
0.1 mg
615-584-214
0.1 mg
615-604-214
0.1 mg
615-624-214
0.1 mg
615-654-214
Antibody Description: VHH Fragment ANTI-RABBIT Alpaca Anti-Rabbit IgG (H+L) (min X Bov, Hu, Ms Sr Prot)
0.0 mg
611-004-215
0.1 ml
611-064-215
0.1 mg
611-474-215
0.1 mg
611-544-215
0.1 mg
611-164-215
0.1 mg
611-294-215
0.1 mg
611-584-215
0.1 mg
611-604-215
0.1 mg
611-624-215
0.1 mg
611-654-215

Advantages of Nano Secondary antibodies

Small size means access to higher resolution imaging

A fraction of the size of conventional antibodies, nanobodies have been readily adopted as powerful tools for confocal and high-resolution imaging as detection reagents (De Groeve et al 2010, Pleiner et al 2015, Barakat et al 2022, Erreni et al 2020). The small diameter of the nanobody format, a 5th of the size of conventional antibody complexes used for indirect labeling (24-30nm), decreases the distance between the probe and the antigen, allowing higher-resolution images to be captured (Pleiner et al 2015, Carrington et al 2019). Consequently, single-domain antibodies have been used to characterize protein conformation, ligand and receptor relationships, and stoichiometries by Single-Molecule Localization Microscopy (SMLM) such as FRET (Förster Resonance Energy Transfer) or TIRF (Total Internal Reflection Fluorescence). Labeling with nanobodies brings the probe molecule into close enough proximity with the target necessary for accurate localization, reducing the linkage error associated with labeling using conventional antibodies, (Shrestha et al 2015, Croup et al 2019, Gormal et al 2020, Lelek et al 2021).

However, direct labeling is not always possible due to the limited availability of commercial nanobodies raised against target proteins. Fluorescently tagging proteins, for example with GFP (Green Fluorescent Protein), is an option but not only does this require cloning and expression of a recombinant protein, the process can alter the conformation and functionality of the protein of interest (Lelek et al 2021).

Jackson ImmunoResearch Nano Secondaries allow the researcher to access high-resolution imaging without the added investment of further optimization. Researchers can still exploit the reduced diameter of the antibody-nanobody complex to visualize at higher resolutions (Pleiner et al 2018). As seen in Figure 2, the addition of an indirect detection step only marginally increases the diameter of the binding complex, with the distance of the probe remaining relatively close to the target protein enabling much finer localization of the target antigen.

All Nano Secondary antibodies are available conjugated to a range of dyes including Alexa Fluor® dyes making them suitable for super-resolution techniques like STED and STORM.

Figure 2. Schematic comparing the linkage error of direct nanobody staining versus indirect IgG+Nano Secondary staining.

Figure 3. Trophoblasts staining highlighting subcellular imaging with JIR Nano Secondaries. Cytokeratin 8 (blue) (DyLight™ 405 VHH Fragment Anti-Rabbit (611-474-215)), vinculin (green) (Alexa Fluor® 488 VHH Fragment Anti-Mouse(615-644-214)), and phalloidin (F-actin) (red). Cytokeratin is an intermediate filament and vinculin is a type of focal adhesion. Both images were blocked with 10% Alpaca serum (028-000-001). Picture credit: Derek Sung, MD/PhD Student · University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine

Polyclonal means reliable and superior signal

Polyclonal detection reagents continue to offer the the best sensitivity by amplifying signal, even from poorly expressing targets. Polyclonal antibodies offer a heterogeneous population of antibodies, each with a different paratope detecting a different portion of the primary antibody. Figure 3 demonstrates that by binding across the whole of the primary antibody, rather than a limited specific site/region/sequence the polyclonal Nano Secondary can decorate the primary antibody profusely, enabling higher labeling efficiency and brighter signal.

The unique CDR (Complementary Determining Regions) of VHH Fragments are reported to enable access to antigen epitopes (Bannas et al 2017) which are otherwise unavailable to conventional antibodies. For example, the long loop structure of the VHH Fragment CDR3 may facilitate binding to protein surface pockets.

Figure 4. Schematic showing the increased number of conjugated polyclonal Nano Secondaries able to bind a primary antibody compared to monoclonal nanobodies. Also it can be seen that the diameter of the complex remains comparable, with the distance between the probe and target protein being similar.

Excellent penetration and clearance

Nanobodies show excellent tissue penetration due to their small size (Chakravarty et al 2014, Debie et al 2020, Hernández et al 2019) which allows them to move freely through the tissue due to having a lower diffusion coefficient than conventional antibodies (Jovčevska and Muyldermans, 2019). The absence of a fragment crystallizable (Fc) further improves clearance of the molecule from tissues making them an excellent tool for diagnostics imaging techniques such as Immuno-PET (Krasniqi et al 2018).

Nano Secondary antibodies utilize these unique characteristics enabling excellent tissue penetration and clearance without the need for extended incubations or potentially damaging detergents.

Figure 5. Immunohistochemistry in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) mouse brain for Tyrosine Hydroxylase. Sagittal sections of mouse brain were blocked with 5% normal Alpaca serum in Tris buffer. Primary antibody, Rabbit anti-Tyrosine Hydroxylase used at a 1:250 dilution at 4C overnight. Secondary antibody, Nano Secondary Biotin-SP VHH Fragment Anti-Rabbit IgG (611-064-215), was used at a 1:500 dilution for 1 hour at room temperature. This was followed by Vector ABC Elite at 1:50 dilution for 30 min at room temperature. A DAB chromogen was used to visualize the TH staining. Tissue was counterstained with Hematoxylin. Images were obtained from slides created and provided by UNC’s Histology Research Core Facility

Figure 6. Immunohistochemistry for CD8 in FFPE mouse spleen. Sections of mouse spleen were blocked with 5% normal Alpaca serum in Tris buffer. Primary antibody, Rabbit anti-Tyrosine CD8 (Cell Signaling #98941) was used at a 1:200 dilution at 4C overnight. Secondary antibody, Nano Secondary Biotin-SP VHH Fragment Anti-Rabbit IgG (H+L) (min X Bov, Hu, Ms Sr Prot) (611-064-215), was used at a 1:500 dilution for 1 hour at room temperature. This was followed by Vector ABC Elite at 1:50 dilution for 30 min at room temperature. A DAB chromogen was used to visualize the TH staining. Tissue was counterstained with Hematoxylin. Images were obtained from slides created and provided by UNC’s Histology Research Core Facility.

Read Nature’s article about researcher Derek Sung’s spectacular microscopy featuring JIR Secondary Antibodies

Stain cells, dead or alive!

Conventional immunoglobulins having an Fc fragment are generally only suitable for labeling of fixed samples, as permeabilization of live cells can affect biological functions via Fc fragment binding. Nanobodies, which lack the Fc fragment can be used for immunostaining of live cells (Lelek et al 2021)

Cross-adsorbed for better specificity and lower background

JIR Nano Secondary VHH antibodies are cross-adsorbed against commonly used species to reduce background and enhance specificity. Our suite of Nano Secondaries can be used in combination to generate exquisitely specific multiple labeling images.

Access to an entire spectrum of dyes

Indirect labeling using conjugated Nano Secondaries gives researchers more experimental scope by allowing them to use fluorophores to utilize wavelengths that may have been inaccessible when cloning in fusion tags such as GFP. Aside from the potential difficulty of adding a fusion tag onto a protein, in avoiding cloning, artifacts from protein modification can be avoided to give more representative functional data (Lelek et al 2021). JIR Nano Secondaries are available conjugated to fluors from ultraviolet to far-red allowing researchers maximum flexibility when building experiments, particularly those identifying multiple target proteins.

Figure 7. Image showing multiple labeling with Nano Secondaries. Lung tissue stained for E-cadherin (epithelial cells) (green) (AF488 VHH Alpaca Anti-Rabbit (611-544-215)) and Alpha-smooth muscle actin (magenta) (AF647 VHH Alpaca Anti-Mouse 615-604-214). The tissue was blocked with 10% Alpaca serum (028-000-001). Picture Credit: Derek Sung, MD/PhD Student · University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine

Applications

  • Immunofluorescence
  • Super-resolution microscopy
  • Western blotting
  • Flow cytometry

Nano Secondary Antibodies

 

Product Description Product Code

Biotin-SP (long spacer) VHH Fragment Alpaca Anti-Human IgG (H+L)

(min X Bov, Ms, Rb Sr Prot)

609-064-213

Biotin-SP (long spacer) VHH Fragment Alpaca Anti-Mouse IgG (H+L)

(min X Bov, Hu, Rb Sr Prot)

615-064-214

Biotin-SP (long spacer) VHH Fragment Alpaca Anti-Rabbit IgG (H+L)

(min X Bov, Hu, Ms Sr Prot)

611-064-215

DyLight™ 405 VHH Fragment Alpaca Anti-Human IgG (H+L)

(min X Bov, Ms, Rb Sr Prot)

609-474-213

DyLight™ 405 VHH Fragment Alpaca Anti-Mouse IgG (H+L)

(min X Bov, Hu, Rb Sr Prot)

615-474-214

DyLight™ 405 VHH Fragment Alpaca Anti-Rabbit IgG (H+L)

(min X Bov, Hu, Ms Sr Prot)

611-474-215

Alexa Fluor® 488 VHH Fragment Alpaca Anti-Human IgG (H+L)

(min X Bov, Ms, Rb Sr Prot)

609-544-213

Alexa Fluor® 488 VHH Fragment Alpaca Anti-Mouse IgG (H+L)

(min X Bov, Hu, Rb Sr Prot)

615-544-214

Alexa Fluor® 488 VHH Fragment Alpaca Anti-Rabbit IgG (H+L)

(min X Bov, Hu, Ms Sr Prot)

611-544-215

Cy™3 VHH Fragment Alpaca Anti-Human IgG (H+L)

(min X Bov, Ms, Rb Sr Prot)

609-164-213

Rhodamine Red™-X (RRX) VHH Fragment Alpaca Anti-Human IgG (H+L)

(min X Bov, Ms, Rb Sr Prot)

609-294-213

Alexa Fluor® 594 VHH Fragment Alpaca Anti-Human IgG (H+L)

(min X Bov, Ms, Rb Sr Prot)

609-584-213

Cy™3 VHH Fragment Alpaca Anti-Mouse IgG (H+L)

(min X Bov, Hu, Rb Sr Prot)

615-164-214

Rhodamine Red™-X (RRX) VHH Fragment Alpaca Anti-Mouse IgG (H+L)

(min X Bov, Hu, Rb Sr Prot)

615-294-214

Alexa Fluor® 594 VHH Fragment Alpaca Anti-Mouse IgG (H+L)

(min X Bov, Hu, Rb Sr Prot)

615-584-214

Cy™3 VHH Fragment Alpaca Anti-Rabbit IgG (H+L)

(min X Bov, Hu, Ms Sr Prot)

611-164-215

Rhodamine Red™-X (RRX) VHH Fragment Alpaca Anti-Rabbit IgG (H+L)

(min X Bov, Hu, Ms Sr Prot)

611-294-215

Alexa Fluor® 594 VHH Fragment Alpaca Anti-Rabbit IgG (H+L)

(min X Bov, Hu, Ms Sr Prot)

611-584-215

Alexa Fluor® 647 VHH Fragment Alpaca Anti-Human IgG (H+L)

(min X Bov, Ms, Rb Sr Prot)

609-604-213

Alexa Fluor® 680 VHH Fragment Alpaca Anti-Human IgG (H+L)

(min X Bov, Ms, Rb Sr Prot)

609-624-213

Alexa Fluor® 790 VHH Fragment Alpaca Anti-Human IgG (H+L)

(min X Bov, Ms, Rb Sr Prot)

609-654-213

Alexa Fluor® 647 VHH Fragment Alpaca Anti-Mouse IgG (H+L)

(min X Bov, Hu, Rb Sr Prot)

615-604-214

Alexa Fluor® 680 VHH Fragment Alpaca Anti-Mouse IgG (H+L)

(min X Bov, Hu, Rb Sr Prot)

615-624-214

Alexa Fluor® 790 VHH Fragment Alpaca Anti-Mouse IgG (H+L)

(min X Bov, Hu, Rb Sr Prot)

615-654-214

Alexa Fluor® 790 VHH Fragment Alpaca Anti-Mouse IgG (H+L)

(min X Bov, Hu, Rb Sr Prot)

615-654-214

Alexa Fluor® 647 VHH Fragment Alpaca Anti-Rabbit IgG (H+L)

(min X Bov, Hu, Ms Sr Prot)

611-604-215

Alexa Fluor® 680 VHH Fragment Alpaca Anti-Rabbit IgG (H+L)

(min X Bov, Hu, Ms Sr Prot)

611-624-215

Alexa Fluor® 790 VHH Fragment Alpaca Anti-Rabbit IgG (H+L)

(min X Bov, Hu, Ms Sr Prot)

611-654-215

Dilution Range: 1:200 to 1:800 for IF

References

  • Bannas, P., Hambach, J. and Koch-Nolte, F., 2017. Nanobodies and Nanobody-Based Human Heavy Chain Antibodies As Antitumor Therapeutics. Frontiers in Immunology, 8.
  • Barakat, S., Berksoz, M., Zahedimaram, P., Piepoli, S. and Erman, B., 2022. Nanobodies as molecular imaging probes. Free Radical Biology and Medicine,.
  • Beltrán Hernández, I., Rompen, R., Rossin, R., Xenaki, K., Katrukha, E., Nicolay, K., van Bergen en Henegouwen, P., Grüll, H. and Oliveira, S., 2019. Imaging of Tumor Spheroids, Dual-Isotope SPECT, and Autoradiographic Analysis to Assess the Tumor Uptake and Distribution of Different Nanobodies. Molecular Imaging and Biology, 21(6), pp.1079-1088.
  • Carrington, G., Tomlinson, D. and Peckham, M., 2019. Exploiting nanobodies and Affimers for superresolution imaging in light microscopy. Molecular Biology of the Cell, 30(22), pp.2737-2740.
  • Chakravarty, R., Goel, S. and Cai, W., 2014. Nanobody: The “Magic Bullet” for Molecular Imaging?. Theranostics, 4(4), pp.386-398.
  • Croop, B., Zhang, C., Lim, Y., Gelfand, R. and Han, K., 2019. Recent advancement of light‐based single‐molecule approaches for studying biomolecules. WIREs Systems Biology and Medicine, 11(4).
  • De Groeve, K., Deschacht, N., De Koninck, C., Caveliers, V., Lahoutte, T., Devoogdt, N., Muyldermans, S., De Baetselier, P. and Raes, G., 2010. Nanobodies as Tools for In Vivo Imaging of Specific Immune Cell Types. Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 51(5), pp.782-789.
  • Debie, P., Lafont, C., Defrise, M., Hansen, I., van Willigen, D., van Leeuwen, F., Gijsbers, R., D’Huyvetter, M., Devoogdt, N., Lahoutte, T., Mollard, P. and Hernot, S., 2020. Size and affinity kinetics of nanobodies influence targeting and penetration of solid tumours. Journal of Controlled Release, 317, pp.34-42.
  • Erreni, M., Schorn, T., D’Autilia, F. and Doni, A., 2020. Nanobodies as Versatile Tool for Multiscale Imaging Modalities. Biomolecules, 10(12), p.1695.
  • Gormal, R., Padmanabhan, P., Kasula, R., Bademosi, A., Coakley, S., Giacomotto, J., Blum, A., Joensuu, M., Wallis, T., Lo, H., Budnar, S., Rae, J., Ferguson, C., Bastiani, M., Thomas, W., Pardon, E., Steyaert, J., Yap, A., Goodhill, G., Hilliard, M., Parton, R. and Meunier, F., 2020. Modular transient nanoclustering of activated β2-adrenergic receptors revealed by single-molecule tracking of conformation-specific nanobodies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(48), pp.30476-30487.
  • Hassanzadeh-Ghassabeh, G., Devoogdt, N., De Pauw, P., Vincke, C. and Muyldermans, S., 2013. Nanobodies and their potential applications. Nanomedicine, 8(6), pp.1013-1026.
  • Jovčevska, I. and Muyldermans, S., 2019. The Therapeutic Potential of Nanobodies. BioDrugs, 34(1), pp.11-26.
  • Krasniqi, A., D’Huyvetter, M., Devoogdt, N., Frejd, F., Sörensen, J., Orlova, A., Keyaerts, M. and Tolmachev, V., 2018. Same-Day Imaging Using Small Proteins: Clinical Experience and Translational Prospects in Oncology. Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 59(6), pp.885-891.
  • Kunz, P., Zinner, K., Mücke, N., Bartoschik, T., Muyldermans, S. and Hoheisel, J., 2018. The structural basis of nanobody unfolding reversibility and thermoresistance. Scientific Reports, 8(1).
  • Lelek, M., Gyparaki, M., Beliu, G., Schueder, F., Griffié, J., Manley, S., Jungmann, R., Sauer, M., Lakadamyali, M. and Zimmer, C., 2021. Single-molecule localization microscopy. Nature Reviews Methods Primers, 1(1).
  • Noël F, Malpertuy A, de Brevern AG. Global analysis of VHHs framework regions with a structural alphabet. Biochimie. 2016 Dec;131:11-19. doi: 10.1016/j.biochi.2016.09.005. Epub 2016 Sep 6. PMID: 27613403.
  • Pleiner, T., Bates, M. and Görlich, D., 2017. A toolbox of anti–mouse and anti–rabbit IgG secondary nanobodies. Journal of Cell Biology, 217(3), pp.1143-1154.
  • Pleiner, T., M. Bates, S. Trakhanov, C.T. Lee, J.E. Schliep, H. Chug, M. Böhning, H. Stark, H. Urlaub, and D. Görlich. 2015. Nanobodies: Site-specific labeling for super-resolution imaging, rapid epitope-mapping and native protein complex isolation. eLife. 4:e11349. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.11349
  • Shrestha, D., Jenei, A., Nagy, P., Vereb, G., & Szöllősi, J. (2015). Understanding FRET as a research tool for cellular studies. International journal of molecular sciences, 16(4), 6718–6756. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms16046718

SUPPORT

outstanding technical support

PRODUCT

we offer a full product guarantee

DELIVERY

we offer free delivery to UK universities and non profit organisations